pig333.com Professional Pig Community

155,791

Real users

Users

Buscar
EN (Global)
Community
Directory
Events
Training
333shop
login

What makes us stand out is the quality and independence of our contents. Find out about the authors who make it possible. Our goal is to generate a virtual community of advanced users in the sector.

Carlos Piñeiro

ADA - Animal Data Analytics - Spain Author

588 Followers 53 Following 72 Articles 1 Publications

Carlos Piñeiro is a DVM from the Complutense University of Madrid (1987). He is a Specialist in the Evaluation of the Environmental Impact from the Polytechnic University of Madrid (1998), he holds a Diploma in Advanced Studies in Animal Production from the Polytechnic University of Madrid (2001), and a Graduate Degree from the European College of Porcine Health Management (2009).

He worked in Sánchez Romero Carvajal as a Representative of superior quality products (1989), and since 1991 he works in Proinserga. S.A, initially as an regional veterinarian (some 10,000 sows in 30 farms) developing different responsibilities in Nutrition and Feed Formulation, Management and Data Analysis, and Artificial Insemination Centres before taking charge of the R&D Department created in 1996 and developing it until year 2000.

It was then when ADA - Animal Data Analytics (PigCHAMP Pro Europa) was created as a company linked to the group in which he participated as a founding partner.

As of 2007, ADA - Animal Data Analytics (PigCHAMP Pro Europa) turns into a completely independent company, and Carlos is his Manager and main stockholder since that moment. Its current lines of business are the investigation, through an agreement, for companies, acting as a CRO (contract research organization); the development of national and international R&D projects (CDTI, EUREKA, IBEROEKA, EUROSTARS, LIFE+ and EU Framework Programs); the consultancy in data management and use of information in the food and agriculture sector companies; and the veterinarian services for the support of production and health.

Updated CV 24-Dec-2012

Send message

Carlos Piñeiro

588 Followers 53 Following 72 Articles 1 Publications

Figure 3. Theoretical altered pattern associated with a reaction to vaccination and results in practice.

NutritionArticle

The management of feeding during lactation largely determines the success of the next parity (II). Factors related to total intake and associated patterns

With current data, we will review the quantitative impact of some of the most relevant factors for sows in the lactation phase.

1 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Photo 1. Precision feeding system in farrowing room (courtesy of Nosia).

NutritionArticle

Lactation feeding management greatly determines the success of the following cycle (I). Factors related to water consumption and the prefarrowing period

This article demonstrates the effects of drinking water temperature and feeding management in sows to optimize performance in farrowing and lactation.

2 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Graph 7. Distribution of responses to the best strategy for implementing a biosecurity plan.

All roads lead to biosecurity

The survey by Pig333 reveals promising perspectives but ample room for improvement in biosecurity.

Likecomment

shareMy favorites

ManagementArticle

Non-productive days or inefficient days?

We propose a more direct indicator to look at and analyze reproductive problems on the farm.

3 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Figure 2. Evolution of the percentage of sows used as nurse sows from 2017-2021.

Genetics-ReproductionArticle

Nurse sows: Evolution over the last five years

The PigCHAMP Pro Europe database was used to analyze nurse sows, which wean almost twice the farm average.

1 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Graph 1. Percentage of sows weaning zero piglets categorized by parity, weanings July 20-June 21.

Genetics-ReproductionArticle

Sows that wean zero piglets: A problem in the farrowing room

Sows that try to recover after weaning no piglets have markedly lower performance and a significant chance of failing in lactation again.

2 Like1 Comments

shareMy favorites

01-Nov-2022beyasu.08Good Job,

Figure 1. Movement routes, at the beginning.

Defining and improving biosecurity rings on a real farm

The biosecurity ring analysis method is applicable on any type of farm and offers an overall perspective that helps us make organized and rational decisions.

2 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Image 1. A schematic representation of farm biosecurity organized in rings.

Biosecurity in rings

We present a biosecurity evaluation method that ensures a comprehensive review: Biosecurity in rings.

1 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Figure 1. Distribution of preweaning mortality by age at death. Spain vs. USA, 2019.

Genetics-ReproductionArticle

Who has better production indexes- Spain or the United States? (2/2)

We continue our comparison of production data between sow farms in Spain and the United States. This time we focus on replacement rate, pre-weaning mortality, and weaning weight.

2 Like1 Comments

shareMy favorites

22-Mar-2022muton-gemmbwonderful content

Figure 1. Productivity tree, Spain vs USA, 2019.

Genetics-ReproductionArticle

Who has better production indexes- Spain or the United States? (1/2)

A comparison of Spanish and U.S. main production numbers on sow farm

6 Like2 Comments

shareMy favorites

18-Feb-2022miguel-angel-de-andres-alvaroHello, it´s Miguel Angel, one of the authors. I completelly agree with you, economical and reproductive efficiency don´t match exactly, although is an indicator (a farm with very high reproductive efficiency usually is economical efficient too). And we work to earn money, not to produce more... Unfortunatelly, to get economical data is much more difficult than to get productive data.

Figure 1.

How to organize a biosecurity improvement plan

Biosecurity is becoming increasingly important for disease prevention. In this article, we discuss how a biosecurity improvement plan can be organized.

3 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Figure 2. Exceptions to the color code for the maintenance team and the manager.

ManagementArticle

Do we know when we fail in biosecurity?

The four most common mistakes on pig farms, illustrated with real examples.

8 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Graph 4. Farrowing rate per parity and quarter of mating, mating period July 16-June 20.

Genetics-ReproductionArticle

Seasonality in mating outcomes: A review

Each farm should analyze its historical data to quantify the effect of seasonality on its farrowing rate and prolificacy.

Like2 Comments

shareMy favorites

02-Nov-2021pig333Thank you for your question. This is referring to the quarters of the year. Q1 = January, February, March. Q2 = April, May, June. Q3 = July, August, September. Q4 = October, November, December.

Figure 1. Key interconnected aspects that should be understood prior to the visit.

Biosecurity audits: Concept and structure

Objective inspection and evaluation that checks current biosecurity measures and points out weaknesses in the system so that improvements can be made.

2 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Figure 1. Percent distribution of litters by size, 2018-2019.

Genetics-ReproductionArticle

How to minimize the impact of small litters

The incidence and distribution of small litters and factors affecting the number of piglets born alive on swine farms.

Likecomment

shareMy favorites

Figure 1. Analysis of the movement pattern on a farm with the digital biosecurity control system.

Objective monitoring of biosecurity (2/2)

The innovative digital biosecurity control system and its application to the objective monitoring of internal biosecurity and on-farm movements.

5 Likecomment

shareMy favorites

1
2
3
4
5

Welcome to 333

Connect, share, and interact with the largest community of professionals in the swine industry.

Celebrating 155791Users on 333!

Sign up Already a member?

Recommended accounts