X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0
Read this article in:

Effects of space allocation and parity on selected physiological and behavioural measures of well-being and reproductive performance in group-housed gestating sows

Our results suggest that at least at the chosen stocking densities, parity and space allocation have minimal effect on a number of commonly-used welfare measures.

3 July 2015
X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of parity and space allowance on selected measures indicative of welfare, and on reproductive parameters, in group-housed sows. Selected animals were at first parity or parity three or greater, and were housed with allocated space allowances per pig of 1.4 or 2.8 m2. Welfare outcome measures included: injury and lameness scores, plasma cortisol levels, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratios and reproductive performance. These values were recorded at a range of timepoints in the first 24 h after mixing, and at 28 days after the mixing event.

In general there were few significant effects of space allowance and parity level on the measured outcomes. However, improved reproduction, as evidenced by increased litter size and born alive figures, was seen as a result of increased space allowance in older animals. A contrary response was observed in gilts. Cortisol responses also indicated that there was a rapid habituation to the stress of mixing with levels returning to baseline within 24 h. Cortisol levels remained low in older animals but unexpectedly showed a peak at 28 days in gilts. It is postulated that this may have arisen as a result of handling events associated with pregnancy testing.

Our results suggest that at least at the chosen stocking densities, parity and space allocation have minimal effect on a number of commonly-used welfare measures.

Alexandra L. Whittaker, Kate J. Plush, Robyn Terry, Paul E. Hughes, David J. Kennaway, William H.E.J. van Wettere. Effects of space allocation and parity on selected physiological and behavioural measures of well-being and reproductive performance in group-housed gestating sows. Livestock Science. Volume 176, June 2015, Pages 161–165. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.007

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list

Related articles

Related products in the shop

The shop specialized in the pig sector
Advice and technical service
More than 120 brands and manufacturers
You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list