X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0
Read this article in:

Protein intake but not feed intake affects dietary energy for finishing pigs

The energy values for dietary protein have to be considered for net energy prediction in fattening pigs.

28 May 2013
X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the level of feed intake and dietary protein level on dietary metabolizable (ME) and net energy (NE) value of complete feeds fed to finishing pigs. Changing feeding level, i.e. feeding pigs restrictively vs. ad libitum, may alter the ratio of protein to lipid deposition. Because protein and lipid deposition differ in their energetic efficiency, the efficiency of energy retention may change and thus affect the dietary NE value.

Twenty-four castrated male pigs, in two blocks of 12 individually housed pigs, were fed either ad libitum (AL) or restrictively (RF), at twice the ME requirement for maintenance (458 kJ/kg0.75), between 55 and 95 kg body weight. Within feeding levels, pigs received a low-protein (LP; 11.2% CP, 0.61% lysine) or high-protein (HP; 20.2% CP, 0.61% lysine) diets of similar digestible energy content, in random order following a crossover design. Dietary NE was calculated from heat production based on 24-h indirect calorimetry following a 7-day N-balance period. Nitrogen balance was conducted by quantitative collection of faeces and urine.

Feed intake was greater for LP than HP when fed for ad libitum intake (P = 0.001). Protein level did not affect daily gain but HP improved gain:feed (P = 0.003). This experiment demonstrated that dietary ME and NE were not affected by feeding level but were decreased when dietary protein content was increased. Reducing dietary protein reduced urinary energy losses and increased energy retention but did not affect heat production. The effect of dietary protein restriction was already evident on the ME level and carried over to a similar degree to the NE level because the utilization of ME was not affected by protein level. Dietary ME and NE decreased by 0.012 MJ/kg (P = 0.014) and 0.018 MJ/kg (P = 0.062), respectively, for each gram per day N intake. The results suggest that although there was an effect of protein level on NE, the greatest effect occurred at the level of ME. However, the prediction of both ME and NE may be improved by adopting energy values for dietary protein that changes with dietary protein content.

Moehn, S., Levesque, C. L. and Ball, R. O. (2013) Protein intake but not feed intake affects dietary energy for finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 97: 174-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01262.x

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list

Related articles

Importancia del suministro energético en la supervivencia del lechón

Importance of energy supply for piglet survival

We have seen the importance of obtaining a sufficient dose of quality colostrum to generate the newborn’s defenses as well as the conflict that this can suppose when we level the litters after birth. Now lets take a look at the importance of rapidly obtaining colostrum and milk to ensure energy supply and minimize temperature loss.

You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list