X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0
Read this article in:

The P digestibility is higher in the low than normal phytate pea-based diet

Phytase supplementation increased P and amino acid digestibility in low and normal phytic P pea cultivars.

11 June 2015
X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0

Barley and pea are common ingredients included in diets fed to non-ruminant animals in Canada. However, they are poor sources of phosphorus (P) because a large quantity of P is bound as phytate P. The objectives of this study were to determine the ileal digestibility of N, amino acids (AA) and total tract digestibility P and energy in growing pigs fed low-phytate barley (LPB), low-phytate field pea (LPP) or normal-phytate field pea (NPP) based diets and also determine the effect of phytase supplementation on nutrient digestibility in the LPP and NPP based diets. Five ileal cannulated barrows (43.6 ± 1.3 kg BW) were used in a 5x5 Latin square design experiment to determine the apparent (AID) and standardized (SID) ileal digestibility of N and AA in LPP, LPB and NPP and the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of Ca, P and energy in diets containing these ingredients. In addition, the effects of phytase supplementation (500 FTU/kg) to diets containing LPP or NPP were determined. The experimental diets contained 869, 868 or 870 g/kg LPB, LPP and NPP, respectively, as the sole source of N. The phytate P contents were 0.4, 0.7 and 2.0 g/kg for LPB, LPP and NPP, respectively.. Titanium dioxide (3 g/kg) was used as an indigestible marker. Each experimental period lasted for 8 d; d 1-4 for adaptation, d 5-6 for urine and fecal collections, and d 7–8 for ileal digesta collection.

The ATTD of DM and GE was not different among diets and was not affected by phytase addition. The ATTD of Ca and P was higher (P<0.05) in LPB than in LPP and NPP diets. Supplementing the LPP and NPP diets with phytase increased (P<0.05) the ATTD of Ca and P. The AID of N and all AA except Met were higher (P<0.05) in LPP and NPP than in LPB, but no difference between LPP and NPP were observe. The LPB-based diet had similar energy and DM digestibility but lower AA, N and higher Ca and P digestibility compared to LPP and NPP. The LPP diets had higher Ca and P digestibility but similar AA, N, DM digestibility and ME value compared with NPP diets.

Therefore, less inorganic P can be included in diets formulated with LPP than NPP thus minimizing feed costs and reducing P excretion associated with the addition of inorganic P.

Kahindi, R.K., Thacker, P.A. and Nyachoti, C.M. 2015. Nutrient digestibility in diets containing low-phytate barley, low-phytate field pea and normal-phytate field pea, and the effects of microbial phytase on energy and nutrient digestibility in the low and normal-phytate field pea fed to pigs. Animal feed science and technology, 203; 79-87. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.02.009

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list

Related articles

You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list