X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0
Read this article in:

Using first and second parity number born alive information to estimate later reproductive performance in sows

Early parity number born alive classification effectively predicts later parity performance. Sows classified as high in both parity one and in parity two had larger litters in later parities.

25 January 2017
X
XLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0

The study objectives were to compare the lifetime performance of sows based on number of piglets born alive (NBA) and NBA across parities, according to 3 NBA classifications in first and second parity. The data used for this study were collected from 2001 to 2014 at 17 farms owned by the same company. Farms were located in the Mid-West region of the United States. A total of 502,491 records accounting for the lifetime performance of 105,719 sows were used in this analysis. Data included both purebred and crossbred sow information. Sows were classified into 3 NBA categories (e.g., low, medium, and high) according to the 25th percentiles of NBA in parity 1 and parity 2. Parity 1 classifications: low <10 NBA, medium 10–12 NBA, high >12 NBA. Parity 2 classifications: low <11 NBA, medium 11–13 NBA, high >13 NBA.

Sows in the low first and second parity NBA classification had an average of 1–1.8 less NBA per parity in parities 3 through 7, when compared with sows in the medium and high NBA classifications, respectively (P<0.05). Conversely, sows classified as high NBA in parity 1 and parity 2 had greater NBA in all subsequent parities as well as total lifetime NBA when compared with sows classified as low or medium NBA (P<0.05). The effect that parity 2 classification has on estimated later parity performance is dependent on parity 1 classification (P-interaction <0.05). The interaction between classification was also seen when predicting total lifetime NBA. As parity 1 classification increased, the difference between estimates of high versus low parity 2 NBA classification sows became smaller. For example, with the removal parity of 7, the difference between a high versus low classified sow in parity 2, both with a parity one classification of low, was 10.3 lifetime NBA. The difference between high versus low parity 2 classified sows that were both high in parity one was 8.6 lifetime NBA. It was shown that parity 1 and 2 classification only had a small effect on the parity of removal.

Overall, it was demonstrated that the use of first and second parity performance, based on number born alive, can be used effectively to predict subsequent parity and lifetime performance which can aid in selection and culling decisions early in the sow's life.

Tasha R. Gruhot, Julia A. Calderón Díaz, Tom J. Baas, Kenneth J. Stalder. Using first and second parity number born alive information to estimate later reproductive performance in sows. Livestock Science. February 2017. Volume 196, Pages 22–27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.009

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list

Related articles

Related products in the shop

The shop specialized in the pig sector
Advice and technical service
More than 120 brands and manufacturers
You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list